Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan: Diplomacy of Brotherhood

Rebel Newsflash: Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan: Diplomacy of Brotherhood (plus 5 more items)

---

• Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan: Diplomacy of Brotherhood
• Citizens, but not equal
• A flotilla headed toward the truth
• "Arabs, get out"
• We Are Change – Freemasons and Jews
• The Process of Revolution

Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan: Diplomacy of Brotherhood Posted: 16 Aug 2010 12:03 AM PDT The trilateral summit of the presidents of three Persian-speaking countries of Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan wrapped up on August 5 in Tehran and recorded another unforgettable event in the memory of the three brother nations. With innumerable cultural, religious, social, lingual and strategic commonalities, the three countries of Iran, Tajikistan and Afghanistan have demonstrated their potentiality to build one of the strongest diplomatic partnerships in the region and benefit the world nations through a unique, fruitful and constructive cooperation.

Citizens, but not equal Posted: 15 Aug 2010 09:41 AM PDT It sure was considerate of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to wish a "Ramadan karim" to our Muslim brothers for their holy month. As they do every year, the radio broadcasts will include reports of how the president hosted "respected Arabs" for an iftar feast at the end of one of Ramadan's daily fasts. It's a lot easier to extend holiday greetings than it is to put a stop to the whims of a group of American Jews who decided to build a Museum of Tolerance on the site of what was once a Muslim cemetery in central Jerusalem. And most difficult of all is to fulfill the long-standing obligations of the state's founding fathers as spelled out in the Declaration of Independence, which calls for granting all its inhabitants "complete equality of social and political rights."

A flotilla headed toward the truth Posted: 15 Aug 2010 09:41 AM PDT It's no wonder that with the conclusion of the testimonies to the Turkel Committee by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Defense Minister Ehud Barak and Israel Defense Forces Chief of Staff Gabi Ashkenazi, some people argue that the panel has exceeded its mandate in investigating the Gaza flotilla affair. They're right, but that's good for Israeli democracy, which is based on the belief that the public has the right to information about the activities of its leaders and their failures.

"Arabs, get out" Posted: 14 Aug 2010 08:41 PM PDT Alright, let's say they succeed. Let's say that the racist nationalist members of Knesset achieve their aspirations to kick the Arab member out of the Knesset. Let's assume that the aspirations of the sweet-lipped extremist Otniel Schneller, the "democrat" Ofir Akunis, and the nationalist Avigdor Lieberman come to pass and the Knesset is free of Arabs. What would happen next? Behind this incitement campaign, like every other, there is no motivation other than arousing the darkest and most basest instincts: 'Arabs, get out' – not to mention 'Death to the Arabs.' So the Arabs are out, what then?

We Are Change – Freemasons and Jews Posted: 14 Aug 2010 03:49 PM PDT I have covered the topic of We Are Change before on this website here, and made it clear that most of their leadership were a bunch of jews.  We Are Change is one of the largest 911 truth groups on the internet, and in the public eye, but that's only to be expected, because jews always lead their own opposition. Thanks to worthless blow hards like Alex Jones, we are chumps gets plenty of exposure to help them stay at the forefront.

The Process of Revolution Posted: 14 Aug 2010 12:16 PM PDT Freedom mostly—if not only—comes by revolution. Revolution is the change of political power from one to another. In the case of America's founding, power transferred from Great Britain to the individual States of America. Inevitably, revolution results in the division and separation from that form or system of government causing the plight. Rarely, if ever, does freedom come by gradual progression. Just the opposite: tyranny comes by gradual progression. Of course, revolution does not have to be violent and only becomes violent when those in control of the existing government forces its will upon those who would chose to be free from its dominion. When a people attempt to be free from a system of government which they deem to be destructive to the ends and purpose of government, those who demand their allegiance and loyalty only heighten the problem and exacerbate the resentment of the people. Consequently, revolution is the result of a government which rules in a manner inconsistent with the principles of a free society, enabling the people to choose different forms of government under different constitutions.

You are subscribed to email updates from Opinion To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610